-
Pam Bondi's time as Attorney General is over, and many are saying she will go down in the history books as the one who covered up the Epstein files.
Not forgetting that the Dow was over 50k, though.Pam Bondi's time as Attorney General is over, and many are saying she will go down in the history books as the one who covered up the Epstein files. Not forgetting that the Dow was over 50k, though.
0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 67 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
3
-
Trump's Birthright Citizenship Scheme implodes after lawyer's jaw-dropping courtroom blunder about Native Americans.
In a stunning exchange at the Supreme Court, the Trump administration's top lawyer, General D. John Sauer, was left grasping for answers when pressed on the logical consequences of the president's proposal to strip birthright citizenship. The courtroom erupted in laughter as the solicitor general struggled to confirm whether Native Americans would be considered citizens under the administration's own legal theory.
The debacle unfolded when Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, asked a simple question to Sauer: under the administration's test for birthright citizenship, are Native Americans born today automatically citizens? The solicitor general's fumbling response revealed the administration had failed to think through the sweeping implications of its radical proposal.
At one point, the government's lawyer conceded that under the administration's own constitutional framework, children of tribal Indians may not be considered birthright citizens - a jaw-dropping admission that sent shockwaves through the courtroom. Gorsuch was forced to essentially rescue the flustered solicitor general from drowning in his own legal quicksand.
The spectacle laid bare the chaos and constitutional crisis that Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship would invite. By unraveling the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship for all persons born on U.S. soil, the administration opened a Pandora's Box with no clear stopping point - as evidenced by its own lawyer's inability to definitively state whether Native Americans would qualify.
This disastrous courtroom performance underscores why the Supreme Court has upheld birthright citizenship for over 150 years. The Trump team's reckless theory proved incoherent and dangerously ill-conceived, even in the eyes of a Trump-appointed justice. The administration's humiliation is a powerful rebuke of the president's campaign to redefine who counts as a "real" American.Trump's Birthright Citizenship Scheme implodes after lawyer's jaw-dropping courtroom blunder about Native Americans. In a stunning exchange at the Supreme Court, the Trump administration's top lawyer, General D. John Sauer, was left grasping for answers when pressed on the logical consequences of the president's proposal to strip birthright citizenship. The courtroom erupted in laughter as the solicitor general struggled to confirm whether Native Americans would be considered citizens under the administration's own legal theory. The debacle unfolded when Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, asked a simple question to Sauer: under the administration's test for birthright citizenship, are Native Americans born today automatically citizens? The solicitor general's fumbling response revealed the administration had failed to think through the sweeping implications of its radical proposal. At one point, the government's lawyer conceded that under the administration's own constitutional framework, children of tribal Indians may not be considered birthright citizens - a jaw-dropping admission that sent shockwaves through the courtroom. Gorsuch was forced to essentially rescue the flustered solicitor general from drowning in his own legal quicksand. The spectacle laid bare the chaos and constitutional crisis that Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship would invite. By unraveling the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship for all persons born on U.S. soil, the administration opened a Pandora's Box with no clear stopping point - as evidenced by its own lawyer's inability to definitively state whether Native Americans would qualify. This disastrous courtroom performance underscores why the Supreme Court has upheld birthright citizenship for over 150 years. The Trump team's reckless theory proved incoherent and dangerously ill-conceived, even in the eyes of a Trump-appointed justice. The administration's humiliation is a powerful rebuke of the president's campaign to redefine who counts as a "real" American.
0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 100 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
3
-
During a live segment on MSNBC Live, Maria Teresa Kumar reflected on former President Barack Obama, saying that seeing him evokes memories of a period in America marked by unity, calm, and opportunity for families.
The remark resonated as a reminder of Obama’s presidency and the contrasts viewers feel with current political tensions.During a live segment on MSNBC Live, Maria Teresa Kumar reflected on former President Barack Obama, saying that seeing him evokes memories of a period in America marked by unity, calm, and opportunity for families. The remark resonated as a reminder of Obama’s presidency and the contrasts viewers feel with current political tensions.
0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 109 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
3
-
Author and activist Marianne Williamson criticized President Donald Trump for launching the U.S. military campaign against Iran based on advice from political allies rather than top military experts.
Williamson highlighted that Trump purged the armed forces last year, removing some of the nation’s most experienced commanders, and then made major war decisions without the kind of expert consultation typically relied upon for actions of such magnitude.
Her remarks underscore concerns about the administration’s approach to foreign policy and national security, raising alarms over global risks, strategic missteps, and the consequences of sidelining seasoned military leadership.Author and activist Marianne Williamson criticized President Donald Trump for launching the U.S. military campaign against Iran based on advice from political allies rather than top military experts. Williamson highlighted that Trump purged the armed forces last year, removing some of the nation’s most experienced commanders, and then made major war decisions without the kind of expert consultation typically relied upon for actions of such magnitude. Her remarks underscore concerns about the administration’s approach to foreign policy and national security, raising alarms over global risks, strategic missteps, and the consequences of sidelining seasoned military leadership.
0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 181 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
3
-
Attorney General Pam Bondi pleaded with President Donald Trump not to fire her during a tense White House meeting, highlighting the fraught internal dynamics leading up to her dismissal. But he did it anyway.
She asked for more time, but Trump sent her walking because she failed him.Attorney General Pam Bondi pleaded with President Donald Trump not to fire her during a tense White House meeting, highlighting the fraught internal dynamics leading up to her dismissal. But he did it anyway. She asked for more time, but Trump sent her walking because she failed him.
0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 145 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
3
-
Mary L. Trump, niece of President Donald Trump, claims that Attorney General Pam Bondi was fired because, in her view, she “didn’t do enough to cover up” for the president — despite having made significant efforts.
Her remarks add a personal and critical perspective on the internal dynamics of the administration, highlighting questions about loyalty, legal oversight, and the political pressures surrounding high-profile departures from the Justice Department.Mary L. Trump, niece of President Donald Trump, claims that Attorney General Pam Bondi was fired because, in her view, she “didn’t do enough to cover up” for the president — despite having made significant efforts. Her remarks add a personal and critical perspective on the internal dynamics of the administration, highlighting questions about loyalty, legal oversight, and the political pressures surrounding high-profile departures from the Justice Department.
0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 161 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
3
Больше
Language
English
VN
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek
Arabic