• A Missouri grandmother is fighting to pass “Bentley’s Law,” a bill that would require drunk drivers who kill a parent to pay child support to the victim’s surviving children. The measure is named after her grandsons, Bentley and Mason, whose parents and baby sibling died in a drunk driving crash in 2021.

    If approved, payments would begin roughly one year after the offender is released from prison and continue until the child turns 18, or up to 21 if they are still enrolled in school. Similar laws already exist in Tennessee, Kentucky, Texas, and Maine.

    Supporters say the law would hold offenders more fully accountable while helping children left behind cover housing, education, and other basic needs — ensuring the loss of a parent doesn’t also mean financial hardship.
    A Missouri grandmother is fighting to pass “Bentley’s Law,” a bill that would require drunk drivers who kill a parent to pay child support to the victim’s surviving children. The measure is named after her grandsons, Bentley and Mason, whose parents and baby sibling died in a drunk driving crash in 2021. If approved, payments would begin roughly one year after the offender is released from prison and continue until the child turns 18, or up to 21 if they are still enrolled in school. Similar laws already exist in Tennessee, Kentucky, Texas, and Maine. Supporters say the law would hold offenders more fully accountable while helping children left behind cover housing, education, and other basic needs — ensuring the loss of a parent doesn’t also mean financial hardship.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    3
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 209 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
  • Reports say the administration of is moving pregnant minors in federal custody to a detention center in ****, raising serious concerns among advocates.
    Critics argue the relocation places these young detainees farther from abortion services and specialized gynecological care, including regular prenatal checkups and reproductive health support. They say the move could significantly limit access to timely medical care.
    Supporters of the policy claim it relates to centralized management of detainees and medical oversight, but human-rights groups warn it could have major consequences for the health and rights of vulnerable minors in custody.
    The situation has intensified debate around detention policies, reproductive healthcare access, and the treatment of minors in immigration custody in the United States.
    #HumanRights #ReproductiveRights #USPolitics #ImmigrationPolicy #HealthcareAccess #Texas #BreakingNews
    Reports say the administration of is moving pregnant minors in federal custody to a detention center in ****, raising serious concerns among advocates. Critics argue the relocation places these young detainees farther from abortion services and specialized gynecological care, including regular prenatal checkups and reproductive health support. They say the move could significantly limit access to timely medical care. Supporters of the policy claim it relates to centralized management of detainees and medical oversight, but human-rights groups warn it could have major consequences for the health and rights of vulnerable minors in custody. The situation has intensified debate around detention policies, reproductive healthcare access, and the treatment of minors in immigration custody in the United States. #HumanRights #ReproductiveRights #USPolitics #ImmigrationPolicy #HealthcareAccess #Texas #BreakingNews
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    3
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 477 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
  • The U.S. House of Representatives has rejected a War Powers Resolution aimed at curbing President Donald Trump’s authority to continue the military campaign in Iran without express congressional approval, with the vote falling 212–219.

    The bipartisan measure, co‑sponsored by Ro Khanna (D‑Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R‑Ky.), would have required the president to end hostilities unless Congress explicitly authorized further military action under the 1973 War Powers Resolution.

    Four Democrats broke with their party and joined most Republicans in voting against limiting the president’s war authority: Reps. Jared Golden (Maine), Henry Cuellar (Texas), Greg Landsman (Ohio) and Juan Vargas (California).

    The outcome leaves Trump with continued executive control over the conflict without a formal vote authorizing war — a major flashpoint in the broader fight over Congress’s constitutional role in declaring and overseeing military action.
    The U.S. House of Representatives has rejected a War Powers Resolution aimed at curbing President Donald Trump’s authority to continue the military campaign in Iran without express congressional approval, with the vote falling 212–219. The bipartisan measure, co‑sponsored by Ro Khanna (D‑Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R‑Ky.), would have required the president to end hostilities unless Congress explicitly authorized further military action under the 1973 War Powers Resolution. Four Democrats broke with their party and joined most Republicans in voting against limiting the president’s war authority: Reps. Jared Golden (Maine), Henry Cuellar (Texas), Greg Landsman (Ohio) and Juan Vargas (California). The outcome leaves Trump with continued executive control over the conflict without a formal vote authorizing war — a major flashpoint in the broader fight over Congress’s constitutional role in declaring and overseeing military action.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    3
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 572 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
  • I almost gave up. Texas. $250K. 5.8%.
    I almost gave up. Texas. $250K. 5.8%.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    3
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 138Кб Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
  • Save Texas from who?
    Save Texas from who?
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    3
    0 Комментарии 0 Поделились 549 Просмотры 0 предпросмотр
Расширенные страницы