A new analysis from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy concludes that Americans bore the overwhelming majority of the costs associated with tariffs imposed during the administration of Donald Trump. After examining roughly $4 trillion in import transactions, researchers estimate that approximately 96% of the tariff burden was passed through to U.S. consumers and businesses rather than absorbed by foreign exporters. Economists involved in the study argue this indicates the tariffs functioned more like a domestic tax on importers and buyers, challenging earlier claims that the financial impact would primarily fall on overseas producers. Supporters of the tariff policy have maintained that the measures were intended to strengthen domestic manufacturing and address trade imbalances, while critics argue that higher import costs ultimately raised prices for American households and companies. The broader debate over tariffs continues to shape discussions around trade policy, inflation, and economic competitiveness. #BusinessBulls #TradePolicy #Tariffs #USPolitics #GlobalEconomy

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger delivered the Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address, implying that President Donald Trump isn't working for America, he's working for himself.

A company in China shocked the internet after placing $8.6 million in cash on a massive table Employees were invited to grab as much money as they could physically carry. The jaw-dropping reward event turned into a frenzy of smiles, speed, and stuffed pockets Talk about a bonus you can literally hold in your hands.

In the heart of Sydney, a simple orange street cat somehow became a local celebrity With zero marketing and pure vibes, he turned into a 4.9-star attraction on Google Maps Locals and tourists stop just to say hi, snap a pic, and leave glowing reviews Proof that sometimes… you don’t choose fame, fame chooses you.

In recent political developments, some senators have publicly discussed the possibility of invoking the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution in relation to Donald Trump, though no official Senate vote to remove him has taken place. A few Democratic lawmakers, including Ed Markey, have argued that certain presidential actions and rhetoric raise concerns about leadership capacity, urging consideration of the constitutional mechanism that allows power to transfer to the vice president if a president is deemed unable to discharge the duties of office. Ratified in 1967, the 25th Amendment requires the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet to formally declare such inability, with Congress potentially playing a decisive role if the matter is contested. Historically, the amendment has been used only for temporary transfers of power during medical procedures, never to permanently remove a sitting president for capacity concerns. Supporters frame discussion of the amendment as safeguarding democratic stability, while critics describe the push as partisan and emphasize that the constitutional threshold is exceptionally high and politically difficult to achieve without broad bipartisan agreement. #USPolitics #25thAmendment #Congress #Constitution #WhiteHouse #PoliticalNews #Democracy